Which interviewing approach best supports gathering accurate information while minimizing retraumatization?

Prepare for the BPOC Sexual Assault and Family Violence Test. Engage with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each offering explanations and hints. Ensure you're exam ready!

Multiple Choice

Which interviewing approach best supports gathering accurate information while minimizing retraumatization?

Explanation:
Open-ended questions. They let the survivor tell the story in their own words, which tends to yield richer, more accurate information than questions that cue a specific answer. By inviting narration and avoiding prescriptive prompts, you reduce suggestion and bias, making it easier for the person to describe what happened without feeling steered toward a certain detail or interpretation. This approach also supports a trauma-informed way of interviewing. It gives space for pauses, allows the survivor to disclose at a comfortable pace, and helps build trust, all of which contribute to less retraumatization and more honest, complete information. Leading questions push a particular answer, which can bias memory and increase distress or mistrust. Interrupting frequently breaks the narrative flow and signals impatience, harming safety and rapport. Rushing to conclusions can close off important details and pressure the survivor to fit a narrative, risking further harm and incomplete information.

Open-ended questions. They let the survivor tell the story in their own words, which tends to yield richer, more accurate information than questions that cue a specific answer. By inviting narration and avoiding prescriptive prompts, you reduce suggestion and bias, making it easier for the person to describe what happened without feeling steered toward a certain detail or interpretation.

This approach also supports a trauma-informed way of interviewing. It gives space for pauses, allows the survivor to disclose at a comfortable pace, and helps build trust, all of which contribute to less retraumatization and more honest, complete information.

Leading questions push a particular answer, which can bias memory and increase distress or mistrust. Interrupting frequently breaks the narrative flow and signals impatience, harming safety and rapport. Rushing to conclusions can close off important details and pressure the survivor to fit a narrative, risking further harm and incomplete information.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy